



| Journals / deviantART, Inc. / Tech & Features | ©2013 $wreckling |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness |
However, as indicated by the immediately preceding comment from xXMoonXWalkerXx, from other comments here and elsewhere and from personal experience, there is an inherent problem in DA that is not being addressed. Popularity and what is hot now or from the past is not necessarily an indication of importance, of interest, of worth, nor of any of the other qualities normally associated with art works. If one takes the view of Trezykx (see extensive comments in this thread) then the reason I (and thousands of others) do not get 500 faves plus more or less instantly for my images is because I do not have the skill and concepts that appeal to people. That is tosh. DA abounds with images that are top quality and do not achieve popularity; DA has many, many deviants that far outstrip many popular members in skill, concepts, and general ability. Now, do not get me wrong at this point. I'm not particularly grousing at popularity - I'm all for it. What I am saying, and I think a lot of folk would agree, is that if you promote popularity (which you do and that is OK), then you should also be promoting the other features/qualities of artwork that are not necessarily perceived as popular, and presenting those works at this same Browse level. There is something here called a Community Project (I do not know much about it), but is this not the type of task such a group could take on?
Cheers
David